Anti-faves in this genre are studies in genetically-modified mice presented as if representative to humans—forget that it's mice, it's not even *mice* mice, and the autopsy of (poor) kid with prior encephalopathy likely due to prior viral meningitis presented as SARS-CoV-2 proof.
-
-
Show this thread
-
It's appropriate for a medical team to submit putative singular results to a pub, even if they don't prove anything by themselves and even if the Sars-CoV-2 is likely not the root cause of a chain of terrible health crises. I mean, better to know, just in case—to watch in others.
Show this thread -
The problem is the next step, that viral thread about the zombie virus. There are enough real concerns, and yes, do keep an eye on all findings. I get it, people don't know who to trust and it is very confusing. Still, it makes it even more important to tweet carefully, imo.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Almost always from the same offenders
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well said
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And jaded by all this back n' forth, many laypersons just glaze over all the papers & headlines shared; some even institute permanent keyword blocks in Twitter and just become ultra-skeptical of everything & everyone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And these are all people who were probably unvaccinated too (data says they were chosen up to March 21).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think people are desperate for info and since the state refuses to give it, people look to individuals for info. Those others have their own motivations or limitations and context free. That info is then used as just another weapon between factions.https://twitter.com/KevinCTV/status/1476243159260831748 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think many pre-prints are fine, heck even twitprints can be good, as long as some review is done and sharing is done carefully, and also peer reviewed papers aren't infallible either.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.