That article and the "novelty means severity" article (you also shared) are the 2 articles I share with EVERYONE. Thank you for passing them along.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Meh. Not by the people who need to be re-informed. The tone needs to be Roganized (and New York Post-right-sized) to have the optimal impact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a good article, but part of the reason it's read alot because there are **so few** other articles explaining why long term effects of the vaccine is not of concern. I have a friend who won't get the vax for that reason, and this is the only article I found to send to her....
-
And even this well researched and intelligent article is possibly too complex for some readers without a scientific background*, so we need even simpler versions of it. (*We all understand different things, it took me 3 years to understand the utilities meters in my building!)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


