The *original* point was about the dominance of aerosols. Physics settles that question. I don't care what you call them, as long as people understand what you mean. Relevant: what you need to mitigate. Hence stress on N95 mask, air purification/ventilation etc.
-
-
There were many phrasing solutions proposed, to get around the various egos and people who cannot admit they’re wrong (yes, I know what I’m talking about) and even the uncertainty, to encompass concerns. It’s a historic responsibility, people have to rise to the moment.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It is progress but also gaslighting that they've said it all along. I was on the meeting where the
@WHO experts yelled at us for suggesting airborne, and told us instead to "wash our hands fanatically". -
And the real problem is that it communicates that no big changes in mitigations are needed since it is the same they said all along
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"So in that sense the virus does spread through the air." That's a pretty grudging admission, especially after the dude's been extensively, er, mansplaining about fomite transmission, for which epidemiology is lackinghttps://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140-6736(21)00869-2/fulltext …
-
As messaging, Ryan's statement is ludicrously inadequate. Almost as inadequate as wearing a poorly fitted, albeit WHO-branded mask, and then congratulating one's self for it
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
with their recent messaging. Hope you agree. 