The observation is that outdoor xmission is about 20x lower than indoor. Dr. Jimenez argues that transmission indoors and out would be equally efficient in and out for droplet xmission. But time, frequency, geometry will all influence droplet xmission. Not only distance.
-
-
No point to keep going at it on a thread. *Many* papers, lots of progress & acknowledgement—more to be done. Anyway, people who worked on this from the earliest days made all these points. They deserve, at a minimum, civility. The apology, too, will come, but that’s for history.
-
I look forward to the forced recantations.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
That you imply that all aspects of this are entirely settled science is kinda astounding. That aerosol spread happens, sure. Relative roles & quantitation of infectivity decay rates over time IRL are NOT at all easy to empirically determine. Models & cute PCR tests don’t cut it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it a case of virosplainning?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@zeynep ,@jljcolorado ,@kprather88 : I suggest that you just ignore@macroliter &@Merz. They’ll never accept your arguments, measurements, models, case histories, published papers. They employ an condescending and disrespectful style of debate. Why bother to engage? -
Maybe we are so used to being condescended to by the
@WHO types for 2 years that we don't even notice any more! - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.