… Unlike changes in the other direction in some other cases, this change was not explained in the WHO report. Worobey’s error was that he thought the change was caused by a mistaken reading of a December 9, 2019 medical record describing a fever - Worobey mistakenly thought …
-
-
… the dental procedure attached to the record was the accountant’s, no, it was from the accountant’s kid. But even there there is a big twist! Turns out the fever medical report was likely the kid’s as well. So in the end what we have now is on one hand this new statement …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
… coming from Liang Wannian that the accountant had some non-fever symptoms on December 8 and that they think the symptom had to do with his eventual confirmed Covid, and on the other hand, as described earlier, the various contemporaneous records that the accountant started …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
… having a fever on December 16.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @zhihuachen @MichaelWorobey
As I say in the thread, I appreciate the effort of everyone, but I don't think the first revealed-to-us cases can make that much progress *either way* without some new data, given how China has been stonewalling, and how much of a mess even the WHO list has been the whole time.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I mean, the Wuhan CDC is right next to market with an extensive bat?/virus collection effort itself, and there are so many open questions about it. Alternatively, the market could be the source and have cryptic transmission all the way to unconnected sources, before us noticing.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
no, the wuhan cdc is not right next to huanan
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
there is a branch office relatively nearby, but the main cdc campus (where research would likely be performed) is kilometers away
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Not only is it very near—a few hundred yards from the market depending on map—the alleged move date of December 2nd has no details or confirmation. I checked and asked, the team was told this date. (But there's a bit more, next tweet). https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/coronavirus-bats-china-wuhan/2021/06/02/772ef984-beb2-11eb-922a-c40c9774bc48_story.html …pic.twitter.com/QtIHxJ0liO
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
halvorz ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Retweeted halvorz ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
going to lose my mind, how am i still arguing about this 1 and a half years laterhttps://twitter.com/halvorz/status/1246306881129324544 …
halvorz ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ added,
halvorz ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ @halvorzReplying to @halvorz @eigenrobotthe retracted paper says it's here https://www.google.com/maps/@30.6135874,114.2621666,21z … 280 m from the seafood market google says it's here https://www.google.com/maps/place/Wuhan+Jiang'an+Center+for+Disease+Control+and+Prevention/@30.589759,114.2967437,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m8!1m2!2m1!1sWuhan+Jiang'an+Center+for+Disease+Control+and+Prevention,+Yue+Fei+Jie,+Jiangan+Qu,+Wuhan+Shi,+Hubei+Sheng,+China!3m4!1s0x342eaf3d33cf73cf:0xb2b47b7a3c24d063!8m2!3d30.5897544!4d114.2989324 …3 replies 0 retweets 11 likes
I have on the record confirmation that it moved right next to the market. But once again, we can't get an answer or details to the simplest question like address history and details of dates, and we are playing Twitter map sleuthing with little to no information.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.