Plot twist for the Science article that generated many headlines about the initial known case being connected to the Wuhan market. As author graciously acknowledges here, the internet researchers—so-called sleuths—have shown the claim to be wrong. Will there be new headlines?https://twitter.com/MichaelWorobey/status/1470159029997428736 …
-
-
It takes real effort and investigation to tease out such complicated things, and we don't have it. Seems credible that China knows of other, likely earlier cases, and surely, they've done the blood-bank testing etc. I'm not sure how we confidently conclude much, given censorship.
-
As the person who pointed out the dental record was a kid, I think
@zhihuachen and@coroldo1 may have a case with the Dec 9 record likewise being a kid based on dosage. Strange coincidence of date and a TCM practitioner should be consulted - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
no, the wuhan cdc is not right next to huanan
-
there is a branch office relatively nearby, but the main cdc campus (where research would likely be performed) is kilometers away
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.