Plot twist for the Science article that generated many headlines about the initial known case being connected to the Wuhan market. As author graciously acknowledges here, the internet researchers—so-called sleuths—have shown the claim to be wrong. Will there be new headlines?https://twitter.com/MichaelWorobey/status/1470159029997428736 …
-
-
Let's say the Chinese government knows (or suspects) that the lab is the source, and that's what they're covering up. Why would they go out of their way to shit on the leading alternative theory?
-
Check very early Chinese scientific papers by their top authors, before the censorship on this topic started. Market as amplifying event and not source isn’t a new claim. That’s what they long said. I don’t have a claim about what they’re doing now. I mean, how do we judge?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.