Agree. I was skeptical in summer—especially since the early data was so confounded. But since then, long before Omicron, we had high-quality data strongly suggesting this is a three-dose primary series. (Happens with many vaccines!). We must equitably vaccinate the world as such.https://twitter.com/priscillagilman/status/1466440935445782530 …
-
-
Yes, and not only because they, too, can get sick and even die—even if much much less so than adults—they can transmit. No child should face the burden of being in a transmission chain to their family. We vaccinate kids against much less deadly diseases.https://twitter.com/MatthewMarchant/status/1466455919848472583 …
Show this thread -
Many. See below from the ACIP meeting. Also, infectious diseases are, well, infectious. Vaccinating children to protect them from the burden of being in the transmission chain that can sicken or even kill their family members is a perfectly good reason. https://twitter.com/Percy43555292/status/1466465048285614091 …pic.twitter.com/jNjTOJnDlJ
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
well sure we could trust science, but I know a guy who has a friend who says otherwise.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The truth is, Israeli data was a great first-warning sign for waning VE, but US was high and mighty on "non American data" and failed to notice it. You still didn't say what was confounded in Israeli data, it's not a magic word you know :)
-
Oh come on. That early data was, of course, confounded from age to contact patterns to urban/rural to behavior. That doesn't make it useless, but of course people try to tease out confounding. This is how it goes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.