I have not figured out how to monetize it, but I may not be as smart as @zeynep, who seems to have almost everything figured out.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/1462800937265897484 …
-
-
Remember all this started when I objected to Twitter censoring her polite, factual questions at EcoHealth. People popped in *my* mentions with “it’s good to censor a grifter” replies. Meanwhile, if people want to deny her a spotlight, I suggest more people ask those questions.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/1462790120101322758 …
-
But you didn’t just object to Twitter “deboosting” her. You asserted that Peter Daszak led an entire field that neither she nor you are a part of into “very troubling corners” & it would have been more “lucrative” to do a postdoc rather than sell her speculative book.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Or maybe the “level of energy” is high because her attempts to profit from baseless speculation inhibits our ability to answer other key questions. It’s false to claim that people on all sides of the origin debate ignored them in favor of criticizing Alina for the harm she’s done
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hear you & understand you didn’t mean it that way but by using postdoc in “The pile-on a single postdoc” signals she should be critiqued less based on her job status, which normally I agree w/ bc of the instability of postdoc positions. I just don’t think that applies here
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.