I can verify this is happening to her replies that have no offensive content whatsoever—but in fact are substantive. It’s likely because people who disagree with her have reported her as “misinformation”—and the automated system is very prone to manipulation like this.https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1462782744635785222 …
-
-
The most dangerous ideas start from relatively small sources that grow when the idea communicated gets muddled and out of hand. It’s a concept historians study in historiography colloquiums.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
Yeah, why is a postdoc with a book taking up your energy as opposed to a WHO expert panel that claimed that the frozen food chain was MORE LIKELY origin than anything related to any lab despite lacking the slightest meaningful access, or EcoHealth that is yet to release key info?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's interesting that you keep bringing up the "frozen food" hypothesis. Unlike the lab leak, we actually have evidence for that one - it's happened multiple times during the pandemic. Still a lot less likely than zoonosis - as the WHO experts correctly concluded.
-
The WHO investigation was a study mission, with no investigatory powers, as Embarek has repeatedly pointed out. Tedros, to his credit, stated that all hypotheses must be investigated.https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/08/12/who-origins-embarek/ …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The frozen food theory is clearly a political conspiracy. But these virologists love it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
