I can verify this is happening to her replies that have no offensive content whatsoever—but in fact are substantive. It’s likely because people who disagree with her have reported her as “misinformation”—and the automated system is very prone to manipulation like this.https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1462782744635785222 …
-
-
Simplistic takes on EcoHealth or Daszak are unhelpful. They did a ton of excellent, important and —dare I say, PRESCIENT —work. I recommend this as a good read.https://twitter.com/stuartjdneil/status/1461254439965282310 …
-
Hey Kamil, don't forget that preprint that Nature, Science, and Carl Zimmer at the NY Times covered. Pre-prints bolstering claims the COVID-19 pandemic did not start in a Wuhan lab are a science writer’s favorite meal.https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/documents-from-the-national-institutes …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Plus many of the issues with the initial known cases in the Worobey paper were *already* identified *months and months ago* by the so-called "internet sleuths" that have uncovered so many factual things of import that I can point to a few bigger issues than a single postdoc.
-
Again, it gets tiresome. DRASTIC wasn’t correct. SARS2 almost without doubt did not originate from whichever cave they claimed. People screw up. Make mistakes. Quoting out of context or finding someone did something at BSL2 doesn’t amount to a conspiracy to silence dissent.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.