Not sure loss of trust so much a problem as diversion of effort (and neurotic chunk of public/compliant businesses slathering everything in alcohol gel) as same authorities continued to bang on about fomite precautions (which they aren't going to stop).
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Honestly that page is such a content design disaster that I doubt anyone in the UK actually reads it. The airborne language has actually been on there since September 14 but I'm not surprised that nobody spotted it until now.http://web.archive.org/web/20210916030847/https://www.gov.uk/guidance/covid-19-coronavirus-restrictions-what-you-can-and-cannot-do …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is frustratingly baffling that it took this long. I understand that misinformation could easily spread when you have a group of strongly incentivized people. But that wasn't even the case for airborne transmissions, yet we kept making one unforced error after another.
-
Idk who put out more misinformation the past 2 years: CDC or Fox News. It’s pretty close.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The CDC director put out a video 2 weeks ago saying masks reduced chance of infection by 80%, which somehow wasn’t flagged as misinformation. I think that was officially the end of anyone taking them seriously. Not that they had much credibility before that. But a very clear end.
-
Direct quote it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.