I don’t think this point is very clear, that it’s your personal opinion, in the article: “we know for sure that the virus is not the product of deliberate gene editing in a lab.”
-
-
Is it possible we may never know because a real investigation was not allowed and the cover-up has been extensive? Sure. Still, attempts to gaslight the public on other matters backfired already so "we don't know and here's why we don't know for sure" seems straightforward to me.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He certainly seems to feel that it’s a relevant source of useful information https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-inquiry/the-sudden-rise-of-the-coronavirus-lab-leak-theory …pic.twitter.com/toJp6mEODO
-
It’s very weird that people keep trying to use him as an authority to assert the opposite of his publicly stated position!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@zeynep could you kindly link to the full texts you shared the screenshots of? I think even (or especially) on Twitter we should always try to properly cite our sources.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.