Delay was apparently was evidence-based. I had thought otherwise at 1st; thought they did not have enough doses. But the mix and matching was just seemed like a random circumstance and even more interesting as a result.
-
-
Heterologous boost — mixing & matching different types — is different. From day one, I heard from the people in the field that they expected it to *work better* and turns out that's what happened. "Follow the Science" shouting on Twitter/media isn't a true overlap with expertise.
-
I think "impure" science has an overlap, but I'd call it performative/poor science for the new public sphere tbh. (For the more straightforward stuff that got fed into the controversy mill, I mean: not that there was no uncertainty, but it wasn't some major epistemic crisis).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.