what's... your point exactly?https://twitter.com/ArisKatzourakis/status/1445038725529022475 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So people have been debunking "viruses don't always become less virulent" (exactly: that's why the link between novelty and severity is key) but then thinking this debunking means the disease burden will remain the same (hence the confusion: immune memory vs virus evolution).+
-
..somehow this got linked to people arguing about future severity? But people arguing this switch between evoking virulence versus immune memory arguments (hence few can make sense of it).

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This situation is really not comparable to Marek's disease.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Fatality rate may also appear to wane because those with increased susceptibility due to comorbidities or genetics have died in earlier waves.
-
Indeed. At some point, looking at (elderly|survived exposure).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I am aware
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
« The study on Covid from
shows: after Covid, an immune deficiency develops. Whether it lasts and whether it makes more susceptible to other diseases remains to be seen. For me, the study shows, as well as others: the model "severe flu" or "fully recovered" is probably wrong »pic.twitter.com/WpX8iuIpDb
-
We don’t know yet what “average less severe” will be for reinfections/breakthroughs, but I find concerning that some will get
#LongCovid on the 2nd infection… could we even think 3rd or…? Vaccination might reduce#LongCovid in breakthroughs
but data still scarce…
advised!https://twitter.com/ahandvanish/status/1447982547544203270 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.