So glad some journalists are actually following these things up! As far as I can tell, these are only some of the unexplained contradictions/puzzles in the early China cases—to the degree we were told anything. Note these "unintended errors" happened despite minimal data shared.https://twitter.com/evadou/status/1415599354488885248 …
-
-
Yeah, there's certainly more. And again, this is about a mere thirteen cases reported to the WHO with some detail (though not even that detailed!) that have multiple "unintended errors" and discrepancies. And this is getting covered only on July of 2021.https://twitter.com/emilyrauhala/status/1415714289751580672 …
Show this thread -
Point out what minimal information we've been given is full of contradictions and errors *and* there's clearly on ongoing and extensive cover-up, someone always retorts "conspiracy theory!" It's the way Trump yelled "fake news!" at anything he didn't like.https://twitter.com/hx81342240/status/1415719587073560584 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I wonder if there's a sense that obfuscation by the CCP doesn't necessarily cut one way or the other w.r.t. the origins question, so why cover it?
-
Maybe? But the kind of errors and contradictions I'm talking about are basic and glaring. I left out pages of such basic stuff from my own NYT piece because it was already sooo long. At least just noting "so little information, and extensive ongoing cover-up" would be better.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.