So glad some journalists are actually following these things up! As far as I can tell, these are only some of the unexplained contradictions/puzzles in the early China cases—to the degree we were told anything. Note these "unintended errors" happened despite minimal data shared.https://twitter.com/evadou/status/1415599354488885248 …
-
-
(Also many of these contradictions were evident the moment the WHO report was published: March 2020. We *only* got *some* information on a few dozen early cases! Sit down with a spreadsheet for an hour and it's a lot of "huh"? July 2021, and finally getting some reporting on it.)
Show this thread -
As I said, I don't like probability calculations when there's so little *real* evidence to "calculate" anything with, and so many unresolved questions. But people have leanings and priors. Fine. But it doesn't touch this question: how could the reporting be so minimal? Baffling.
Show this thread -
Yeah, there's certainly more. And again, this is about a mere thirteen cases reported to the WHO with some detail (though not even that detailed!) that have multiple "unintended errors" and discrepancies. And this is getting covered only on July of 2021.https://twitter.com/emilyrauhala/status/1415714289751580672 …
Show this thread -
Point out what minimal information we've been given is full of contradictions and errors *and* there's clearly on ongoing and extensive cover-up, someone always retorts "conspiracy theory!" It's the way Trump yelled "fake news!" at anything he didn't like.https://twitter.com/hx81342240/status/1415719587073560584 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.