We know the early cases, as reported to us, were missing, incomplete and withheld. We know there are contradictions between earlier papers from Chinese scientists and what later got told to WHO. We know there are missing sequences and papers, even among what little got released.
-
-
Show this thread
-
If people want to say we're not going to get an investigation—at least with China's cooperation—because of this cover-up, fine. One can still learn lessons. But the idea we're evaluating some actual substantial body of "evidence" from an actual investigation just doesn't hold up.
Show this thread -
For clarity, even after these corrections, there are still contradictions around early cases compared with other papers by Chinese scientists. The WHO report had some data on *just* thirteen early cases, and even that had multiple "unintended errors".https://twitter.com/emilyrauhala/status/1415662357502627842 …
Show this thread -
(Also many of these contradictions were evident the moment the WHO report was published: March 2020. We *only* got *some* information on a few dozen early cases! Sit down with a spreadsheet for an hour and it's a lot of "huh"? July 2021, and finally getting some reporting on it.)
Show this thread -
As I said, I don't like probability calculations when there's so little *real* evidence to "calculate" anything with, and so many unresolved questions. But people have leanings and priors. Fine. But it doesn't touch this question: how could the reporting be so minimal? Baffling.
Show this thread -
Yeah, there's certainly more. And again, this is about a mere thirteen cases reported to the WHO with some detail (though not even that detailed!) that have multiple "unintended errors" and discrepancies. And this is getting covered only on July of 2021.https://twitter.com/emilyrauhala/status/1415714289751580672 …
Show this thread -
Point out what minimal information we've been given is full of contradictions and errors *and* there's clearly on ongoing and extensive cover-up, someone always retorts "conspiracy theory!" It's the way Trump yelled "fake news!" at anything he didn't like.https://twitter.com/hx81342240/status/1415719587073560584 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can you share your opinion on ivermectin? Why is it being censored by so many media platforms?
-
Why would anybody censor ivermectin? The evidence for any efficacy is just kind of weak so it's not very interesting to talk about. There are still randomized controlled trials ongoing for it, as I understand. If they report good results I'm sure there will be lots of coverage.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Aren't you the genocide-denying account? Yep. Anyway, bye.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.