There may be a wider problem here. I did a new referenced biographical entry that was rejected because it did not meet their historical standards which, being an history prof, I took with my normal good grace. 
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The bias of any subject on Wikipedia depends on the bias of the editors who cruise those pages.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All editors and contributors to Wikipedia should follow the rules outlined here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AEditing_policy?wprov=sfla1 …. Any dispute should be brought up. Wikipedia is very much consensus driven. Is it perfect ? Absolutely not. But it's pretty darn good and the best encyclopedia humans have.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rings false, because wider issue, as male with reverts, edits often reverted by wiki overlords, no stats, but others agree. Had some luck resorting to deleting just false or misleading info when replacing fails. Gave strong supported claim while deleting. Talk pages do not fix.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.