An apology and explanation: My draft, with full sourcing, was in to my editor before @KatherineEban’s excellent piece covering especially the sleuthing—which wasn’t my focus—at great length was published. (The material had been ignored by US media!). Still, I should’ve linked.https://twitter.com/KatherineEban/status/1408782784378908674 …
-
-
Ralph Baric has said you can’t rule things out or prove them just by looking at the genome. And yet people debate the furin cleavage site on Twitter. Meanwhile, biosafety—a basic, structural and forward-looking issue—is elided. (But this is the thread for FCS, if you insist.
)https://twitter.com/wanderer_jasnah/status/1394247714024660994 …Show this thread -
This is an amazing piece, featuring quotes from Dr. Ralph Baric—one of world’s foremost scientists on bat coronaviruses, and co-author of Dr. Shi of WIV on that 2015 paper with the chimeric virus. *Really* worth your time. By
@rowanjacobsen in@techreview. https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/06/29/1027290/gain-of-function-risky-bat-virus-engineering-links-america-to-wuhan/ …pic.twitter.com/OSSCrcC8JB
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Read through your NYT article the other day, fantastic read. Thank you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry this content is not available on Thread Reader
It has been removed by the author.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


).