And yet, where sars1 broke out is also over 1000 kilometers from the Yunnan caves. fact-check meet fact-check.https://twitter.com/zhihuachen/status/1408753168863928322 …
Complex systems, wicked problems. Society, technology, science and more. @UNC professor. @NYTimes columnist. My newsletter is @insight: http://www.theinsight.org
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
Zhihua Chen Retweeted Zhihua Chen
And yet, where sars1 broke out is also over 1000 kilometers from the Yunnan caves. fact-check meet fact-check.https://twitter.com/zhihuachen/status/1408753168863928322 …
Zhihua Chen added,
Something I *explicitly* point out in my piece and is true, unlike the nonsense I highlighted above. You've been tagging me with a lot of factually incorrect things lately, so I'm going to kindly request you either read what I write or stop the non-stop tagging. Thanks.
Now I’m thoroughly embarrassed. Please point out the factually incorrect things I tagged you. I’m just obsessed with this situation. And I imagine it’s very taxing for you to actually correspond with everyone.
At the risk of getting blocked
, I’ll still link here the three things I tagged you with, which I don’t think are factually incorrect. Two are critiques of specifics, one takes inspiration from your discussion of civets. By the way, I read your piece and thought it very helpful
Zhihua Chen Retweeted Zhihua Chen
Zhihua Chen added,
Zhihua Chen Retweeted Zhihua Chen
critique 2, forwarding someone else’s discussion.https://twitter.com/zhihuachen/status/1409162687762911236 …
Zhihua Chen added,
Zhihua Chen Retweeted Zhihua Chen
Last one, expansion on exonerating civets. And I will stop.https://twitter.com/zhihuachen/status/1408515985326456837?s=21 …
Zhihua Chen added,
OK much easier to follow, thank you. Answers in a bit.
Last one is easiest. Bat-to-human plausibility makes the search for the intermediary animal less necessary as proof of lack of lab involvement. But makes bats at labs a higher risk factor. Also people living near bats. So it’s not leaning in a single direction, weight-wise.
Two: in July, Dr. Shi says testing “recent” and vouches for all other labs in Wuhan as well. There’s not enough clarity there re:timing but I take recent to mean recent.
First one: the problem has always been lack of a simple and obvious acknowledgment to 4991 and the outbreak in the initial Nature paper. Whatever else was/wasn’t acknowledged elsewhere hasn’t been the issue raised.
Agreed that the 2020 nature paper didn’t make any connection to 4991, the bat sample id (Ge XY 2016 Virological Sinica) which the Shi team consistently made use of to construct names in prior publications for this particular coronavirus they sampled from the mojiang mine.
Agreed. So I think this addresses the three points you raised? (Other two up thread).
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.