Another attempt at a gift link.
https://twitter.com/rednfiery/status/1409124414684233735 …
-
-
Last one is easiest. Bat-to-human plausibility makes the search for the intermediary animal less necessary as proof of lack of lab involvement. But makes bats at labs a higher risk factor. Also people living near bats. So it’s not leaning in a single direction, weight-wise.
-
Two: in July, Dr. Shi says testing “recent” and vouches for all other labs in Wuhan as well. There’s not enough clarity there re:timing but I take recent to mean recent.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

, I’ll still link here the three things I tagged you with, which I don’t think are factually incorrect. Two are critiques of specifics, one takes inspiration from your discussion of civets. By the way, I read your piece and thought it very helpful