this is one thing I keep meaning to point out: not finding close SARS-2 relatives in the wild is not evidence against a natural origin, because any lab origin scenario *also* requires close SARS-2 relatives in the wildhttps://twitter.com/beyerstein/status/1404828329719500808 …
-
-
right, that's the paper just tricky to tell from their figures what the exact numbers are, definitely varies across the genome though some regions >98%, others in the low 90s
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.