So do we still believe that 1) during the OG SARS epidemic, residents in a different but downwind building acquired virus from an infected building upwind, *and* that 2) risk of outdoors sars-cov-2 acquisition is so low we don't need masks?
-
-
Now that you mention it sth like the bus sounds reasonable - is the raw data of the original study available in order to make double sure that the association between windows/air direction / people in the other buildings was more likely to be just coincidental ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just read the 200 meters scenario and yep, you are right - sounds too much - airborne transmission is a fact but in that particular case it probably occurred in another situation like common transport rather than from l such a long distance
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.