One of the most fascinating dynamics of this pandemic is the Twitter/media/pundit feedback cycle. (This was documented before for other topics, too.) Now, with many top scientists not as active, if at all, on Twitter—pandemic keeps them busy—it’s gotten even more interesting.
-
Show this thread
-
Don’t get me wrong, I’m active here so not saying it’s wrong to be. But the sampling here is clearly very lopsided. But it’s easy to look only here and gain impressions that look solid but aren’t necessarily so if you do the legwork—which is getting harder, given state of media.
1 reply 12 retweets 204 likesShow this thread -
But it’s a feedback cycle! Media people quote the most accessible people who are sometimes, in fact, a group, which then gets represented as what we know and then the busy scientists not on here may decide that’s not a hill to die on—or not even notice. They’re not even asked.
12 replies 39 retweets 317 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @zeynep
there’s a serious Kardashian Index problem on Twitter with COVID-19 “experts,” who due to their visibility on Twitter get quoted a lot in MSM even though they’ve done little to no original research on COVID-19
@PaulBieniasz has complained about this. he calls them “demi-experts"3 replies 1 retweet 15 likes
No that’s not the problem I’m talking about. (That’s something different).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.