Saw a lot of people amplify the incorrect takeaway from this study (they reported low efficacy of one dose, but....)
The fact that it was so low - and so inconsistent with other data - should’ve been a giant caution flag. Many just blew through it and amplified anyway.
https://twitter.com/roby_bhatt/status/1390479147298873347 …
-
-
Apparently reading the corresponding text which explains what the numbers actually represent instead of relying on row/column titles in data tables is expecting too much of most people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
