I'm all for keeping an eye on variants—I wrote an article warning about B.1.1.7 last year when it became clear it really was more transmissible and dangerous—but looking at a relative increase in a tiny, nonrandom sample and calling it a "surge" isn't it. https://twitter.com/ThatRyanChap/status/1387811724246532099 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
I don't understand this credentialism, to be honest. I'm not an epidemiologist, and Eric has doctorate in epidemiology even if he specialized in nutritional impacts. This is barely third grade math here, if that, so the exact doctorate isn't the problem.https://twitter.com/BoobyJargon/status/1388183627813429251 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's dusturbing that there are some people who kinda want to see the pandemic be further prolonged/worsen for their own self-serving interests. These people are just as problematic as the COVID deniers.
- Show replies
-
-
-
I bought into his fear mongering for so long until I found your very realistic analyses. Thank u for your work
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mr. Dick-Feigl does not have time for facts!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What are basis points anyways

-
Basis point equals 1/100th of a percent.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I really don’t understand what he, and others who peddle in needlessly scaring people w false/misleading pandemic info, get out of it. What is the point?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
