If you put it together, it's true that distancing and masks are key, but when you have the right predominant mechanism—aerosols—there are differences. Indoor and outdoor policies can differ, for example, and distance is good but not enough indoors and depends on ventilation.
-
-
I want to add two things that I see confused/claimed. First, see this thread and the paper itself where we explicitly discuss whether the predominance of close contact transmission implies gravity-driven droplet transmission is primary or even a lot.https://twitter.com/MackayIM/status/1383370706843410433 …
Show this thread -
This paper looks at totality of observed data and evidence from past year, and argues why aerosol-transmission as primary route can parsimoniously explain it all, while droplets as primary route contradicts key parts of the evidence. I'd love to read the opposite case if written.
Show this thread -
Second: I keep seeing claims that if it's aerosols, that means cloth or surgical masks are useless, and also what's called "droplet precautions" are useless. The aerosol experts have written so many papers on why that's not the case, and, in any case, that's not what we observe.
Show this thread -
The paper, while word-limited, does go into both of these topics, but as with any shift like this, I agree the implications deserves more attention/explanation, and hopefully more soon, partly because part of the problem were some flawed assumptions in multiple directions.
Show this thread -
And, this doesn't bind my co-authors, but I think our evidence-base is stronger for discriminating between droplets vs. aerosols, but not as much for fomites especially through resuspension etc. No, not washing groceries but.. I'd wipe down high-touch surfaces in crowded indoors.
Show this thread -
We briefly address this (word limit!
) but it's not correct to assume that airborne transmission necessitates either a high R0 like measles or even a uniform transmission pattern. Tuberculosis is airborne but has lowish R0—but likely also overdispersion!https://twitter.com/bobby_dread/status/1383787373134184450 …
Show this thread -
Another good addition for people following this topic is Dr.
@linseymarr, a true pioneer in this field (her latest in@bmj_latest, also out this week(!), was titled "Covid-19 has redefined airborne transmission").https://twitter.com/linseymarr/status/1382842521286549508 …Show this thread -
And just putting this thread here so people can get some context of how difficult it has been, for so long, to make progress.https://twitter.com/linseymarr/status/1383066390136041477 …
Show this thread -
Feels like an inflection point. Do read what the article linked by Dr. Karan argues: that short-range (close contact) transmission of respiratory infections is also PRIMARILY aerosols—goes against decades of claims of aerosols only/mostly being long-range. https://twitter.com/AbraarKaran/status/1384240928873844742 …pic.twitter.com/xvf2bQeES8
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I know people who religiously age their mail and packages 48 hours in an unused area. How many people have caught the virus from deliveries? Zero?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
