I guess I'm old-fashioned but I tend to think that when your first instinct is to attack someone's credentials, you don't have a good argument, especially when it comes to complex multidisciplinary policy questions that it's good to have different perspectives on.https://twitter.com/celinegounder/status/1382299663269761024 …
-
-
Probably makes more sense to go from broad principles that we know apply (on trust/information etc), focus on minimizing trade-offs whenever possible, and prioritize saving lives since a lot of the rest can be tweaked along the way but rolling back exponentials is really uphill.
-
(I'm just admitting obvious limits here... )
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yeah, though decisions must be made. I get the clinical impulse (blood clots/brain/very low platelets=that's a WTF combination: see it in AZ, then J&J, yeah WTF) and I get the other calculation (lives lost/suffering because unvaccinated plus clots/complications due to infection).
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.