Given the dramatic and— let's be honest—irreversible consequences of the announcement of a J&J pause, why aren't we set up to have had ACIP already convene last night? I'm for investigating everything, even this rare (6 out of 7 million), but we should be set up for this by now.https://twitter.com/US_FDA/status/1381925615478132739 …
-
-
Not only is this true for many "stay in your lane" dunks ("the dunker" is not qualified, just dunking), the problem remains even when it *is* deserved and "the dunker" is qualified. The problem is.. the 21st century itself. Have to adapt, not wish it away. https://twitter.com/MClendaniel/status/1381984654270599169 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
Okay, I'm gonna go back to what I was writing but for now, conclusion: dynamics of the public sphere in the 21st century cannot be ignored, and cannot be solved merely with better communication, even if we can advocate at least for that part to happen. The response has to adapt.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It also doesn't help those of us who exist in public roles where we are asked opinions about subjects well outside of our expertise but still need to be the most well-read and give the best answer we can.
-
Some of us wish we could stay in our lane but have to give advice amidst conflicting sources
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
16 months in, can we all agree "stay-in-your-lane SARS-CoV-2 transmission mitigation discourse" is bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Contributing to a problem it can't solve" is both the definition and the goal of punditry, no? And there seems to be an infinite market
#onhere for lane-crossing punditry.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that certainly doesn't mean Nate should keep talking either.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your tweet is certainly a collection of words
-
sufficiently arch that I certainly have no idea what the tone here is
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But what happens if no one involved in a convo is qualified to judge whether other participants are qualified to accurately dunk on others for their lack of qualifications?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.