Similarly, previous (not that well-established) claims of high infection rate through models based on (maybe, maybe-not accurate) nonrandom seroprevalance are NOT, by themselves proof of widespread reinfection, or even that reinfected cases are severe or equally contagious etc.
-
-
Anyway, h/t to the tweet/meme from
@jbakcoleman last night that inspired this thread.
https://twitter.com/jbakcoleman/status/1380024099083186178 …This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
Stellar comment in response to my last newsletter (about the unfathomable celebration of Florida's "Grim Reaper" attorney dude who was harassing people on beaches): "Nuance can feel like signal-weakening, so people over-signal to push the equilibrium." https://zeynep.substack.com/p/pandemic-as-metaphor/comments …pic.twitter.com/9hVO2woq4T
Show this thread -
Adding this as it's important even though it's sprinkled in the thread. Potential confounders make confident conclusions hard—but it's also hard to rule out direct causation. We can, and should, act against exponential threats even when facing uncertainty.https://twitter.com/rvenkayya/status/1380222793577594882 …
Show this thread -
Too often, a call for nuance and epistemic humility is conflated with inaction & decision paralysis, leading to the "signal overboost" noted above. Ideal world: perfectly possible to state limits of certainty while advocating for real action within the context of trade-offs.
Show this thread -
Seeing a lot of this in Long Covid discussions, too. We should be able to say that post-viral sequelae/Long Covid is real, important and too often neglected without ignoring baseline comparisons or turning it into something so ill-defined that it becomes easier to ignore/dismiss.
Show this thread -
Yeah sorry about that! I should just keep writing long-form about all this (I will!).https://twitter.com/Goldammerfeder/status/1380239103464247297 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I have been DYING to find some real realistic research on what is happening down there! Even the scientists I follow seem to be willing to put a lot of credibility in that reinfection model which seems just thinly evidenced so far, I don't get it.
-
I just don't understand why anyone finds that seroprevalence study strongly convincing, but it sure does provide a scary narrative that some have latched onto
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@threadreaderapp unroll pls -
Sorry this content is not available on Thread Reader
It has been removed by the author.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. What’s odds last spring 2020? 1 in 3.
That is likely an effect of
(HT