I don't know, I've been stunned to hear from people -- not a lot, but some -- who've enjoyed the past year and will be sorry to return to normal life. And there's definitely a masks forever constituency, though it might be larger on here than in the real world.
-
-
agree and agree. my general point is that I think people have a lot of anger and angst (very understandably!) but there's no foreign terrorist to be mad at. It's a virus. And a lot of that gets projected out at imagined people who are making our lives like this or want to keep ..
-
2/ our lives like this once the pandemic ends. When in fact, we're in the midst of a pandemic. And it's mainly the virus, not weird people who like lockdowns.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Most mask mandates require masks outdoors only when the wearer would not be able to maintain 6 foot distance. From others. Doesn't that still make sense? Why not better explain outdoor mask requirements instead of relaxing them?
-
No, it does not make sense. Masks outdoors make sense only for *extended* contact in very close proximity (especially if talking) but indoors, they make sense even if beyond the six feet. The main transmission mode is clearly aerosols, not droplets, and hence those are different.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This seems premised on the idea that the mass of the American public can handle subtleties, and respond quickly to changing advice that may either loosen or tighten req'ments. I assert that this is very far from the case. The word "public" in "public health" is v. significant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.