I do think there’s an opportunity for a large-scale panel of the kind @JessicaFeezell suggests, building on efforts by folks like @themarkup @LeonYin. Though none of this solves the self-selection -> feedback -> ... issue
-
-
Agreed. I'd be interested to know if such a model would obviate the need for the differential privacy methods that seemed to make Social Science One so difficult (from afar, at least).
@SolomonMg@kinggary@persily might have insight on this, I imagine. -
Yeah. I got pandemic-interrupted but this maybe something we can take up at some near future? Honestly, the companies need help, too. Their risk is bad publicity, but I think that doesn't really harm them that much (and they get it anyway) and clarity would help us all.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
For researchers in small countries is something we just hear from you all. No data, no access, nothing. Making analysis this way is just so hard. Hope one day we all have access.
-
I hear you. In
@polarizationlab , we are fundraising to open-source our social media platform for scientific research so that anyone can use it. Definitely not as good as running experiments inside companies, but also gives researchers total control (& better consent process) - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I hope someone is researching the history of all of these efforts. I had not heard of this one and would love to learn more.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Employees can access this data anywhere (with their corp laptops). As can professors (and interns) on Facebook's payroll. What's the difference? If it's just legal leverage, can we just create that without them being payed?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
