That's what it may take, this time, too. As we've seen with HIV, too, it's perfectly plausible for effective drugs to shield a select few for a very, very long time—and the "but it will mutate elsewhere" never become realized as a big enough threat to move the needle.
-
-
When the term “Hobbesian” appears on Twitter, it’s my cue to exit the conversation. Thanks for the stimulating chat, all
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes exactly this
. And there it matters some how sound the rationale is—so I think the questions you’re raising are key and also we should be cautious because if it is scientifically sound (leave that to the virologists) then we want this argument in the arsenal -
Yeah, as my piece says, nobody doubts that eliminating unchecked viral propagation is better, but strong evidence that all three variants of concern may have risen through chronic individual infections plus antiviral treatments (One in the UK! Not "over there").
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not to prolong this more than needed, but wasn't Ryan White a key reason why HIV/AIDS began to be taken more seriously—an example of the disease hitting closer to home?
-
Happened earlier. Not influential in global access to AIDS treatment.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.