The more immunocompromised people, and just people generally, that are infected worldwide, the more evolution we will see. I don’t think it’s a poor scientific argument. We can only have boosters if the evolution is stepwise elsewhere and we know about it. No guarantee of either
-
-
What’s the historical examples of this backfiring?
-
Perception/fears of infectious diseases/xenophobia/discrimination have long been completely intertwined. It was as late as 2009 (after much pressure) USG allowed HIV+ people to apply for citizenship, and US *still* excludes TB for example. And that's all recent!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.