This is really important. Stuff getting publicized *without a paper* and without sufficient time for many scientists to look at, digest, comment and contextualize can lead to terrible outcomes—needlessly scaring people. We saw that happen with widely misreported studies before.https://twitter.com/EricTopol/status/1364769339434409984 …
-
-
Something has to fill the void. I mean, the news media just experienced 5 straight years of headlines writing themselves. They've all become addicted to shock-jock. Supply will fill the demand.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Schools have been doing this for years, having their PR department oversell studies faculty members are publishing taking advantage that most of the popular press has no or weak scientific reporting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Was there ever any follow-up to this study on MMR titers? I haven't been able to figure out if this was bad science reporting or something to be concerned about: https://mbio.asm.org/content/11/6/e02628-20 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.