No doubt young people can contribute a lot to spread, but the way to deal with that is to figure out the risks and avoid driving them into crowded indoor socializing and to test them often. (Also don’t gather them in dorms & send them home in a panic without testing. Like Fall.)
There's a difference. We *do* know of a lot of superspreading events indoors, just not any outdoors. If I may encourage you to check out the overdispersion aspect. Lots of places got away with such indoor events, but some did not, and it was catastrophic.https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/09/k-overlooked-variable-driving-pandemic/616548/ …
-
-
I know re vast indoor/outdoor difference (I think you even refer to my http://superspreadingdatabase.com in that article)& how that difference shows it's aerosols not large droplets that drive this pandemic, but Tuscaloosa event is one of many that suggest we know way less than we think.pic.twitter.com/DtvQYrGML0
-
Thousands of people partying loudly, packed, many indoors, at (what turned out to be) the peak of a pandemic, and cases drop. Just about nobody had expected that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
special aspects CoV2&Vit.D: 1.daily(UVB)dose protects for few days as much as high blood level=season. vulnerab. earlier&longer in people of color 2.epith.response to IFN‐γ promotes infection in gastroint. mucos,Vit.D
=IFN‐γ
,lung sympt. simult. with systemic s.=swallowed virusThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.