I try not to block actual criticism but things I've started pretty much automatically blocking to make Twitter usable: Snitch-tagging; "Oh you're surprised?" reply guys; People who respond to an article *I* wrote with a point made in the article as if I could have no idea.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/1361678304793808897 …
-
-
Finally, I write a lengthy, detailed article about something. Someone comes with a "have you tried rebooting it" type comment as if I'm a novice, and an idiot, and clueless? I used to tolerate and then realized nothing good ever comes out of that because of the clutter they add.
Show this thread -
I wish Twitter let us pin a separate block policy thread so people know. And finally, my experience from before I blocked is that these categories have a lot of repeat offenders so blocking just a few useless repeat offenders really improved my mentions.
Show this thread -
Why not mute? I tried. Because people reply to them (which I see) and others see them and affects the quality of the discussion I do want to have, and also because snitch-taggers can work even when muted. I mute some non malicious people who just say the same thing a lot.
Show this thread -
Other than that, I truly and honestly appreciate people who object to something I write or say, or have a point I missed, or point out something that I may not like but is actually a point. Even when it gets testy and contentious as it does with opinionated people. That's fine.
Show this thread -
Finally, this is an attempt to be able to hear real criticism and feedback in my mentions. If I don't do this, the roar of the people who make the most obvious points back to me or are just uselessly smug will drown others out. The smug and stupid minority are very repetitive.
Show this thread -
What I mean by the kind of thing I do block—because these people are repeat offenders with no any useful content. I don't mean disagreement, even if testy and contentious. I mean pointing out to me the most basic thing about a field I work and write in.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/1361685049268133888 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just here to say I think your work is brilliant, necessary, and wonderfully engaging. I teach *Twitter and Teargas* every year and routinely refer to you as "the most clairvoyant intellectual in America" because it's true.pic.twitter.com/f2gobXSjKL
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't have anything like your audience, but I see these categories in women's reply threads more than in my own, which makes me wonder if there's a gendered aspect to it.
-
Yep. Yep. Yep. I'll write some lengthy piece about, say, federated machine learning, that's actually published in an industry magazine like Wired and some dude will be in my mentions saying stuff like "machine learning require a lot of data." Really? Had no idea.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.