This sucks, but at least they mention open windows. My inbox and DMs are full of people—and have been for months—who are not *allowed* to do any mitigation for airborne spread at work even when it's easy and available because "it's not in the guidelines."https://twitter.com/Riastradh_/status/1355989688956366848 …
-
-
There are others, too. The message about aerosols and airborne transmission was dismissed, resisted, attacked despite increasing evidence (again Japan/Hong Kong etc. had this by Feb 2020). When it's written, it will be an interesting and illuminating history of how things fail.
Show this thread -
Yes! Had them typed out and ran out of space and got distracted. Also
@jljcolorado has been doing tremendous bilingual, global work.https://twitter.com/happyhexer/status/1357175586200850435 …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yep - full year, almost to the day. First piece for me was Feb 9. Covers aerosols, ventilation, MERV-13 filters, portable air cleaners w/ high efficiency filters, humidity...https://www.ft.com/content/5083fd42-4812-11ea-aee2-9ddbdc86190d …
-
major US newspaper declined to take this in late January, so that's why I went international w/ FT. Wouldn't be til mid-March that I could land a similar piece in US newspaper...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Your Atlantic piece about ventilation and this from
@jljcolorado felt like important moments in US public consciousness about airborne transmission. I remember people who were not closely tracking the issue sharing both with me.https://time.com/5883081/covid-19-transmitted-aerosols/ … -
That was the one I was able to use and say this is legitimate and I'm not some kind of crackpot (about this anyway:) who thinks they know more than CDC and WHO. Which admittedly does sound a little shaky at first!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.