Getting a slightly early preview of FB’s decisions isn’t special access that in itself compromises scholars. @evelyndouek has been studying FBOB and I’m glad she got that preview. She has been a critic, a wise one, so any grief is unwarranted. @BostonJoan
-
-
So it sounds like it’s the researchers and journalists who should refuse early or exclusive access? I think of embargoes, at least, as a way to help ensure the public gets a more thoughtful, nuanced analysis out of the gate. But I also see how access can drive perception
-
I don’t mind embargoes if they are broadly offered. There are hundreds of people in this particular space.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.