You notice a minority of scientists were early to advocate: 1. asymptomatic COVID19 occurs 2. masks are useful 3. rapid tests are useful Yet opposition on each came from other scientists. Why? Is it because training has promoted p<0.05 to the point we can't do Baynesian anymore?
-
-
Thanks like synthesizing from emerging evidence into policy, being proactive and figuring out when precautionary principle is appropriate one facing exponential growth, and when caution is warranted (unproven drugs obviously and I’m a great fan of UK Recovery that way).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yes, that makes sense. great points, thanks for your thoughts
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.