I'd like to highlight a point about epistemology. Many people—scientists and journalists—with infectious disease experience immediately pegged this as the next potential SARS. It had all the hallmarks. Nothing was certain, but it wasn't that we had "no data." We always have data.https://twitter.com/DimaBabilie/status/1345861726370205696 …
-
-
Isn’t there also “reserve second dose” vs “assume supply chain is going to keep working so that we know second doses will be coming in 3 weeks”?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if I was 70-80+ years old, I'd take 50% protection now, not 0% protection over the next two or three months
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In addition to "no data", other phrases I'd like to get rid of include "follow the evidence/science" and "irresponsible to have this discussion"
-
Would be much better if people engaged on the substance of a question directly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
… 1/