Like Helen Nissenbaum privacy theory (she calls it Contextual Integrity) where it's really about appropriate flows of info and societal context evolving over time.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @antoniogm @Nale
There is decades—many decades—of research with many excellent books and articles that treat privacy as to be understood as about shifting boundaries, power and context and as a constant compromise that's historicized. Just the lit review could be book length.
0 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @antoniogm @Nale
Yes, they probably wouldn't just decide flattening out privacy/visibility and thinking it can be managed via obscure little checkboxes without understanding the context of privacy (and wouldn't be all powerful billionaires, true). But the point is it's not an obscure idea at all.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Privacy as a constant-shift negotiation (that you say you have not encountered) is so mainstream and common...
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @antoniogm @Nale
Many academics wrote about all this very publicly, were invited by and gave many talks at tech companies, since the beginning. It was not some obscure debate tucked in academic journals. This included Nissenbaum and others.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
But it went as well as research on smoking or traffic accidents did before those industries came around, kinda—that happened kicking and screaming but industry somewhat adapted, eventually.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.