Not an expert, but like experts, I am fully fucking confounded.https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/01/health/coronavirus-vaccines-britain.html …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @slavin_fpo
If you read the actual guidelines that’s not what it says.
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @slavin_fpo
Wow. Bottom of page 11, if you want to check. This is the by NY times? I’m sure Twitter will take this article down now.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Peg 11 of the guideline I mean, Linked in the same article. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/948757/Greenbook_chapter_14a_v4.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @samba_diego @slavin_fpo
Yes. Very useful to actually *read* them which makes it clear it’s an edge case, not a policy. Presented if the option is withholding the booster from someone who is high-risk & might not return—and for whom the first type is unknown. It even notes the lack of interchangeability.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @samba_diego
Oof
@zeynep I read the article before posting but not the guidelines themselves. Thank you for doing the work and clarifying1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Yeah, unfortunately read the actual document is often necessary—even when it shouldn’t be.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.