And we (Michael and I) are advocating for going ahead with a two dose regimen while *immediately* going ahead with a trial—should have started yesterday. Which is the exact point this started from. I'm answering the "weaponization" charge separately.
No, the opposite. I appreciate the rundown. I'll write a longer reply; this is too much substance for Twitter. Probably a newsletter post. Feel free to add any. :-D I think about this stuff all the time, is the truth of it.
-
-
(Or if you know anyone—you?—who'd want to write a (paid) guest post for my newsletter on all this, and I can respond longer there). The truth is, all those are risks, and will always be, but I think they cannot be avoided by avoiding the topic.
-
This gets to the heart of something important, that the public sphere is not one where the gatekeepers control the gates anymore, and for better or worse, it's reality & we have to figure out how to deal with this effectively and in the public interest (something I believe in).
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.