On venue: Something like this needs attention and resources *and* public understanding—The fact I would argue exactly to prevent misinformation and misunderstanding. Doesn’t preclude other writing.
Research (especially disaster sociology) says accountability and transparency help, but it is a rapidly changing environment so we're all going with some sense of things as we see them, here. And I think detailed explanations are good but always worth thinking about framing.
-
-
So I appreciate the feedback! As an addition, data-wise, I am particularly concerned that there won't be sufficient resources to track down and provide booster to older people who clearly are higher risk but more likely to miss it. (HCW will not miss it).
-
(So maybe another piece: you may have heard we're trialing single-dose and/or some governor is suggesting a single-dose! Unless you're in that trial, please go get your second dose and/or states please make sure to put resources in follow-up, starting with higher risk). /n
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.