There has been *tons* of messaging touting the vaccines. You're asking for more than that, for scientists to get ahead of the data. We will have the data soon, and adjust messaging accordingly.
-
-
Ideally, we'd have "be first, be right, be credible" from the agencies, with individuals playing a secondary role. But that's not where we are. And the "won't prevent infection" message is really big out there despite it's lack of immediate relevance (given hcw are first).
-
And, again, all this is because I *praised* an article communicating the nuance and *including* proper details on why they will likely dampen transmission, to some degree, to be determined later, during which time we will keep up masking etc. if lucky enough to be vaccinated.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This challenge seems to be coming from a ton of different sources and scientists communicating what their expertise is pretty far down the line. Scientists did not force the NYT to issue a push notification on a single adverse event.
-
No, but that's what we're facing. I'm describing what's out there.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I forgot to circle back but others have the same impression as me on what the message had “morphed into.” As I said, I monitor these things and no doubt there were people (like you!) who said what I praised in the first tweet. But what he is saying below has been happening.https://twitter.com/hankgreen/status/1341165998674567169 …
-
I wonder if Americans are less appreciative of (or less able to handle?) uncertainty in covid communications than the Germans.https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-12/mpif-gwo121020.php …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.