Who is calling for gloom? Many scientists have acclaimed this as one of the greatest achievements in human history, including myself on local news. See @EricTopol feed yesterday. Scientists sticking to the data rather than endorsing PH guidance based on speculation isn't gloom.
-
-
So if everyone keeps saying "they will likely reduce transmission but we don't yet know so use caution for now" my initial response, request and point will be less necessary. Right now, it is necessary because a sense that they will not, without a timeline, is what's out there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Further up in the thread you said that scientists were focusing on the gloom of the unknown & that misinformation is thriving because we fail to communicate nuance. Now you say we are communicating that nuance but it's somehow not getting out? I'm confusedhttps://twitter.com/zeynep/status/1339581692802199552?s=20 …
-
Anti-vaccine advocates are claiming that scientists are saying the vaccines won't prevent transmission, but most scientists are not actually saying that. Anti-vaxxers are creating false narratives. It's wrong to claim this is solely an issue of failed communication by experts.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You say this message isn’t getting out there Where is “out there” and what’s your evidence for this claim? I literally don’t know *anyone* who hasn’t heard this message loud and clear.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.