Yesterday, the FDA panel—no social science person on it—didn't separate out vaccine approval vote for 16-17-year-olds. Four members thus voted no to the whole thing but only because of the age inclusion. Already seeing questions & misinformation on the "no"s. Pointless own goal.
-
-
Yes, but I'm no social scientist or even very aware but as I listened I was going "WTF he's not dividing the question? Is he deaf? Does he want a bunch of noes?"
-
It seems to me like the failure here was not focusing on trust issues in handling the meeting process. I'm not sure having a social scientist present is either necessary or sufficient to fix that. (And I think you mean something more specific than "social scientist.")
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.