I understand the concern over Timnit’s resignation from Google. She’s done a great deal to move the field forward with her research. I wanted to share the email I sent to Google Research and some thoughts on our research process.https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f2kYWDXwhzYnq8ebVtuk9CqQqz7ScqxhSIxeYGrWjK0/edit?usp=sharing …
-
-
I think the case is different here, when particular literature is not covered, the paper may still get accepted but it'll appear under Google's name without giving enough credit. Google seems to prevent this.
-
If Google had given the names of the reviewers, who rejected her paper internally, this time she would possibly try to bash them on Twitter, as she tried to bash Jeff now.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I also don't understand what additional literature they wanted them to include- the embedding debiasing literature is not that encouraging
-
where i worked they used publications to show off other stuff they had researched. pretty much an ad, so to speak. so. if all the researches he said they wanted in the paper was done by google i'm pretty sure this is it. but i'm too lazy to check.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.